Use the DetailFlow workflow strictly to create my product detail page.

DetailFlow Skill: https://github.com/AJbeckliy/detail-flow

Before starting, read and follow the latest rules in that Skill, especially:

• Image Generation Workflow
• Ecommerce 8-screen product detail page
• Continuity Rules
• Revision Routing
• Post-generation Audit

This is a production ecommerce detail-page assignment, not concept art, a PPT, brochure, infographic, moodboard, or visual experiment.

1. Core objective

Create one eight-panel ecommerce product detail page.

The eight panels must look like:

Eight consecutive slices of one continuous, long ecommerce product page.

They must NOT look like:

• Eight independent advertising posters
• Eight PowerPoint slides
• Eight infographics
• Eight social-media ads
• One overview image cut into eight parts

All final images must be commercially suitable for direct use on a real product listing.

2. Information and source-material priority

Always apply the following order, from highest to lowest:

1. Facts explicitly confirmed by the user
2. Official product specifications, packaging data, manuals, listings, and other documents supplied by the user
3. Authentic product photographs and video frames supplied by the user
4. The approved Blueprint
5. The approved Text Master, Visual Master, and Style Reference
6. Facts reasonably observable in the images
7. Reasonable AI inferences
8. Free AI creativity

A lower-priority source must never override a higher-priority fact.

When sources conflict:

• Identify the conflict explicitly.
• Do not arbitrarily select one version as fact.
• Prefer conservative wording.
• Record the uncertainty under risk_unknowns.
• If it materially affects commercial accuracy, obtain confirmation before using the claim.

3. Analyze Inputs

After receiving product materials, do not immediately generate the final images.

First analyze all supplied materials, where available:

• Real product photographs
• Product photographs on white backgrounds
• Close-up product details
• Packaging photographs
• Accessories
• Usage, installation, and application photographs
• Technical specifications
• Product pages
• Manuals and documents
• Brand assets
• Style-reference images
• Competitor references
• Requirements for content that must be preserved or excluded

Separate findings strictly into four categories:

A. Confirmed Facts — Facts explicitly confirmed by the user or official materials.

B. Observed Facts — Facts directly visible in supplied imagery.

C. Reasonable Inferences — Reasonable interpretations based on product category, construction, and visible evidence.

D. Unknown / Do Not Invent — Missing, conflicting, or unverified information that may not be fabricated.

Never invent any of the following without confirmation:

• Technical specifications or materials
• Features or functions
• Certifications, awards, or patents
• Tests, performance results, or durability data
• Sales volume or conversion figures
• Medical, efficacy, or protection-rating claims
• Brand partnerships
• Discounts, warranties, or minimum order quantities (MOQ)
• Lead times or shipping commitments
• Package contents

4. Product Identity Lock

If authentic product images were supplied, establish a Product Identity Lock.

Record the product’s immutable visual characteristics wherever relevant:

• Overall shape, proportions, thickness, and color
• Materials, surface texture, and patterns
• Logo and brand marks
• Packaging design and packaging text
• Buttons, openings, ports, and screens
• Knobs, zippers, handles, and brackets
• Connectors and joining structures
• Accessories and distinctive forms
• Number of products and components
• Spatial relationships among components

Lock only characteristics that genuinely apply to this particular product.

Product authenticity takes priority over making an image look prettier.

Reject any enhancement that turns the product into a different SKU, structure, color, or material.

When sufficient authentic images are available, prefer real product assets + AI-generated environment/scene + professional layout, not asking AI to redraw a vaguely similar product.

5. Style Reference Analysis

If style references are supplied, analyze more than their colors. Extract:

• palette
• lighting
• contrast
• camera angle
• lens language
• depth of field
• composition
• negative space
• product scale
• typography
• information hierarchy
• icon language
• label / badge style
• material treatment
• scene density
• visual rhythm
• background world
• recurring motifs
• transition language
• commercial photography level

Extract the reference’s Style DNA.

Do not copy a reference image’s brand, identifiable people, text, products, or trademarks.

When the user explicitly approves a particular reference or visual master, treat it as a binding visual constraint for subsequent panels, not merely inspiration.

6. Eight-screen Detail Page Blueprint

Stage one: Deliver a complete 8-screen Detail Page Blueprint.

Each screen must include, at minimum:

• slice_id
• buyer_question
• module_type
• module_label
• claim_seed
• screen_job
• evidence_type
• content_density
• layout_archetype
• copy_module_type
• copy_structure_pattern
• primary_module
• secondary_modules
• text_exact
• hierarchy_strategy
• composition_shift
• top_edge_anchor
• bottom_edge_anchor
• visual_composition
• reference_style_notes
• risk_unknowns

7. Claim Seed rules

Establish 2–4 core claim seeds in Screen 01 before developing later screens.

Each seed must:

• Matter to the overall purchasing decision.
• Be specific enough to substantiate in later screens.
• Not be an empty adjective.
• Not assert unverified technical or commercial claims.

Screens 02–08 must develop these seeds by explaining, demonstrating, substantiating, comparing, showing details, placing them in context, building trust, and guiding the buying decision.

Do not invent a new unrelated selling point on every screen.

If a later screen cannot be traced back to a seed in Screen 01, revise the seed or the screen.

8. Screen differentiation

Every screen must address a different buyer_question.

Adjacent screens must not mechanically repeat the same:

• screen_job
• evidence_type
• composition
• headline structure
• “headline + subtitle + three icons” template
• product hero scale
• information-card layout

Vary information density and visual organization across the eight screens.

Potential modules include:

• hero
• macro detail
• feature proof
• mechanism
• comparison
• step sequence
• scenario
• annotation map
• specification proof
• trust section
• configuration
• closing CTA

All modules must still belong to one consistent visual system.

9. Internal fields must not appear in the delivered imagery

These Blueprint/workflow fields are for internal use only:

• slice_id
• module_type
• module_label
• screen_job
• claim_seed
• evidence_type
• content_density
• risk_unknowns

Unless the user explicitly requests otherwise, never put any of these internal labels into buyer-visible graphics:

• 01 / 02 / 03 / 04 / 05 / 06 / 07 / 08
• Screen 01
• Product Overview
• Feature Breakdown
• Parameter Trust
• FAQ
• Module
• Section
• Blueprint-style labels

A filename may be product_screen_01.png, but the image itself must not automatically display “01”.

Numbering that describes actual product instructions, such as steps 1, 2, and 3, is permitted.

10. Approval Gate 1

Stop after completing the Blueprint. Wait for the user’s first approval.

Without that approval:

• Do not generate final detail images.
• Do not produce formal slices.
• Do not advance to final visual production.

11. Master stage after the first approval

Once the Blueprint is approved, establish:

1. Text Master
2. Visual Style DNA
3. Visual Master Spec
4. Product Identity Lock
5. Structure Blueprint
6. If appropriate, a continuous 1:3 long-page visual master

The Visual Master Spec must establish, at minimum:

• palette
• lighting direction
• background world
• product rendering strategy
• typography
• spacing system
• information hierarchy
• material language
• icon language
• camera language
• product scale rhythm
• section rhythm
• transition logic
• recurring motifs
• negative space rules

12. Rules for the 1:3 Visual Master

The 1:3 master is a visual continuity reference only, not a finished product.

Never:

• Deliver it as the final detail page.
• Cut it directly into eight final slices.
• Enlarge it to produce final-resolution imagery.
• Take screenshots of it to use as finished slices.
• Treat it as a contact sheet.
• Split it into a final package for convenience.

Use the master only to establish a shared background world, space, lighting, color, product scale, visual rhythm, typography, hierarchy, page continuity, and transitions between upper and lower portions.

Reject a master if:

• It looks like eight separate posters, slides, brochure pages, an infographic grid, or a contact sheet.
• The product’s identity or construction drifts.
• The style diverges from the reference.
• There is no spatial continuity across the long page.
• The information hierarchy conflicts with the Blueprint.

A failed master must not be used for final slice production.

13. Production rules for final slices

Once the master passes review, produce:

• Slice 01
• Slice 02

The default final aspect ratio is 9:21 vertical, unless the user specifies otherwise.

Create every final slice independently.

Do not directly turn any of the following into a finished slice:

• The 1:3 master
• An overview graphic
• A contact sheet
• A moodboard
• A Blueprint illustration
• A low-resolution sketch
• A preview image

If the existing composition does not match the final aspect ratio, use proper recomposition, layout adjustments, a regenerated environment, sensible outpainting, and repositioned product/copy modules.

Do not force the ratio through Gaussian-blurred padding, mirrored padding, stretching, arbitrary enlargement, low-resolution crops, background blur filler, or oversized borders.

14. Authentic product asset usage

When real product photographs are supplied, retain the authentic product as faithfully as possible.

AI may work on the environment, setting, props, lighting, extended space, backgrounds, atmosphere, and nonessential decorative elements.

Reject any generated result that changes the product’s SKU identity, including:

• Shape or color changes
• Logo, material, or pattern changes
• Different ports or component counts
• Altered construction
• Incorrect packaging text
• Missing or newly invented key parts

15. Text rules

The Blueprint’s text_exact is authoritative for all final copy.

Important text includes:

• headline
• subtitle
• specifications
• dimensions
• model
• feature names
• steps
• CTA
• warnings
• certification text

Do not let an image-generation model freely rewrite this content.

Prefer reserving areas for copy, applying typography after image generation, and using deterministic text composition with controllable fonts.

Correct any spelling mistakes, incorrect numbers or units, garbled characters, omissions, or unauthorized copy rewrites in generated imagery.

Never overlook incorrect text merely because the overall image looks good.

16. Internal audit of Slices 01–02

After generating the first two slices, audit each separately.

Product Identity

• Is the product authentic and consistent?
• Did the SKU, shape, color, or material drift?
• Are the logo and construction correct?

Copy

• Does the copy match text_exact?
• Are spelling, technical specifications, and units correct?
• Are there garbled characters, internal fields, or unwanted screen numbers?

Claim Safety

• Were unverified parameters, certifications, performance figures, commercial claims, awards, or brand partnerships added?

Commercial Quality

• Does the image look like a real ecommerce detail page?
• Does it look obviously AI-generated, sketch-like, slide-based, infographic-like, or like a cheap promotional poster?
• Is the product sufficiently sharp, with professional visual hierarchy?

Continuity

• Do Slices 01 and 02 look like parts of the same long page?
• Are lighting, typography, product depiction, and background world consistent?
• Is the vertical transition convincing?
• Do the screens avoid using two full-size heroes in succession?

If any critical check fails, revise before proceeding to the approval stage.

17. Two-Slice Preview

After both slices pass their internal audits, create a 2-slice concat preview.

The preview serves only to evaluate continuity. Creating it must not alter the final slices through:

• Added blurred backgrounds
• Added borders
• Re-layout
• Product changes
• Copy changes
• Ratio changes

The preview should simply concatenate the actual finished images as they are.

18. Approval Gate 2

Present together:

• The 1:3 Visual Master (if used)
• Slice 01
• Slice 02
• The 2-Slice Preview
• A brief audit

Then stop and wait for the user’s second approval.

19. After the second approval

Only after the second approval may you generate Slices 03–08.

Continue following the approved Blueprint, Text Master, Product Identity Lock, Visual Style DNA, and Visual Master.

Do not redesign the visual system halfway through.

20. Full-page Audit

After completing all eight slices, create a full concatenated preview and check:

Product Consistency

Does the product retain the same identity throughout?

Text Accuracy

Are all copy, technical specifications, numbers, and units accurate?

Claim Continuity

Can every central selling point be traced back to a claim seed established on Screen 01?

Visual Continuity

Does it read as one continuous long page?

Composition Variety

Do successive screens avoid repeating the same layout?

Unsupported Claims

Is there any assertion the user has not confirmed?

Commercial Readiness

Ask:

Could I place these eight images directly on a real product page without explaining the production process to a customer?

If not, the work does not pass final acceptance.

21. Failure criteria

Stop production rather than continuing if any of these occurs:

• AI changes the product into a different product.
• Product construction is clearly wrong.
• Logo, packaging, or patterns are wrong.
• Important copy or specifications are incorrect.
• Unverified certifications or claims appear.
• Visual style differs materially from the approved reference.
• Every screen looks like an independent poster.
• The long-page continuity disappears.
• Final images are cut out of a low-resolution overview.
• Blurred padding is used to force the aspect ratio.
• Results are obviously only sketch-quality.

“Generated” does not mean “approved for quality.”

22. Revision principles

Prefer the smallest effective revision:

• Copy error → repair only the text layer.
• Product error → repair only the product layer.
• Background error → repair only the setting/background.
• One-screen composition issue → revise only that slice.
• Transition between adjacent screens → fix the neighboring transition.
• Widespread style drift → return to the Visual Master.
• Incorrect selling-point logic → return to the Blueprint.

Do not regenerate the entire set by default.

Do not conceal failures with blur, mirroring, forced enlargement, borders, cropping out the problem, excessive filler icons, or recutting an overview.

23. Final deliverables

Deliver:

• Approved Visual Master, if used
• High-resolution final Slices 01–08
• 2-Slice Preview
• Full-resolution Long-page Concat
• Lightweight Long-page Preview
• ZIP Package

File names may use:

• product_screen_01.png
• product_screen_02.png
• …
• product_screen_08.png

File numbering does not imply that the number must appear inside the artwork.

24. Default international-market requirements

Unless I explicitly specify otherwise:

• Use English for all buyer-visible copy.
• Follow international B2B/ecommerce visual conventions.
• Keep claims specific, restrained, and credible.
• Avoid cheap promotional styling.
• Avoid generic AI marketing language.
• Avoid slide, infographic-template, or brochure aesthetics.
• Invent no technical or commercial claims.
• Never sacrifice product authenticity for visual impact.
• Do not add irrelevant selling points to fill empty space.

25. Prohibition on sequential screen numbering

Do not display sequential screen numbers in the final buyer-visible artwork, for example:

• Screen 1 showing “1”, “01”, “Screen 1”, or “01 Product Overview”
• Screen 2 showing “2”, “02”, or “Screen 2”
• Screen 3 showing “3” or “03”
• …
• Screen 8 showing “8” or “08”

“Eight-screen” describes the internal production and slicing process, not a buyer-visible numbering system.

Allowed:

• Filename: product_screen_01.png
• Blueprint field: slice_id: 01
• Production-management label: Screen 01 / Slice 01
• Actual instructional steps: 1 / 2 / 3 / 4
• Real specification, model, or quantity numbers

Not allowed:

• Sequentially labeling all eight buyer-visible panels 01–08
• Decorating the top-left corner with large page numbers
• Using “01 / PRODUCT OVERVIEW” as a decorative headline
• Using “02 / FEATURES” or “03 / APPLICATIONS” as artificial section numbers
• Displaying eight sequential numbers just because this is an eight-screen workflow

Unless I explicitly request numbered sections, no final detail image should carry a sequential page-number motif.

The goal is a professional, authentic, continuous ecommerce product detail page ready to publish.

I will now provide the product photographs and product information.

Begin strictly with DetailFlow’s Analyze Inputs stage.